On June 16, 2026 (Day 110 of the Iran-Israel-US war, Operation Epic Fury / Tuesday), the freshly signed framework hit its first serious test as Iran attached a condition Israel has already rejected. THE FAULT LINE: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the tentative deal to end the war with the United States would require Israel to withdraw from Lebanon — a demand Israel has flatly rejected and which, per the Associated Press, “could sink the agreement, leading to the resumption of all-out war.” Araghchi told foreign ambassadors in Tehran that “any military attack by Israel against Lebanon from this point forward, as well as any continued occupation of Lebanese territory, will be regarded by us as a violation of the memorandum of understanding” (CBS, AP/PBS, ABC, CBC). Iran’s military command threatened retaliation if Israel continues its southern Lebanon offensive, with one faction telling Reuters there would be “no nuclear deal between Iran and the United States unless the Israelis withdraw” from Lebanon (Times of Israel). ISRAEL’S POSITION: Israel, which is not a party to the US-Iran deal, reaffirmed its troops would remain in a buffer zone in southern Lebanon “as long as necessary” (Netanyahu, who called the deal “Trump’s decision”), while far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir declared “Trump’s agreement does not bind us” (CBS). TRUMP AT THE G7: speaking at the summit in Évian-les-Bains, President Trump warned that “all hell will rain down” on Iran if it attempts to develop, purchase, or otherwise acquire a nuclear weapon, saying the preliminary deal “says it loud and clear,” while also criticizing Israel’s conduct in Lebanon — “too many people are being killed” — even as he praised his relationship with Netanyahu (Times of Israel, CBC). THE FUNDS DISPUTE: Vice President JD Vance denied that Iran would receive “billions of dollars of assets,” calling reports of it “not true,” and Trump said the US would not “invest” funds in Iran — even as senior US officials told reporters the framework includes the possible release of frozen funds and a $300 billion fund to help rebuild Iran if Tehran meets certain benchmarks (CBS — US-official-sourced, partly contradicted same day). HORMUZ: despite Trump’s “toll-free” authorization, vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz had not changed since the deal announcement, per AIS tracking data — shipowners appeared to be waiting for the planned June 19 signing and Iranian confirmation before attempting transits, which continued to hug shipping lanes near Iran’s Larak and Qeshm islands rather than the central route (Argus). NUCLEAR TRACK: the 60-day clock covers enrichment and a possible commitment to “dilute or remove” Iran’s highly enriched-uranium stockpile, though verification and who would remove the uranium remain unresolved and Iranian hardliners oppose giving it up (AP, ABC). Net assessment: Day 110 is the first doubt day of the post-signing phase — the framework is intact on paper but the Lebanon condition, openly framed by Iran as a deal-breaker and openly rejected by Israel, is the fault line most likely to collapse it before Friday’s formal signing, while the real-world signal that matters most — actual Hormuz tanker traffic — has not yet moved.